The story of previous FBI Director James Comey is a wound one. Is it safe to say that he was subtly utilizing FBI resources for bolster either of the two candidates for president? What did he think about the charged impedance by Russia in our decision? Why was he let go by President Trump? What revelations would we be able to hope to get notification from him?
As his testimony before the Senate has started, there is an expectation that we may find solutions to no less than a couple of those inquiries. This depends, obviously, on the Congresspersons asking the correct inquiries, and also Mr. Comey being blunt in his answers. We’ve absolutely observed a lot of the inverse when people, for example, Hillary Clinton seemed to give testimony.
A standout amongst the most vital inquiries that requests to be addressed are from where have the holes started. It turns out from his declaration that Comey, himself was the source. He is the person who gave the requests to discharge certain subtle elements to the press.
“Fired FBI Director James Comey told the Senate Intel Committee on Thursday that he asked a friend of his to leak to a memo he kept regarding his conversation with President Trump to the press.”
That and the data that takes after ought to give you a smart thought why he ought to have been rejected.
“Comey admitted this after Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), asked him why he kept the memos. She then asked if he ever shared any of them outside the DOJ.
“Of course this was leaked to the New York Times. They ran with the story that Trump was pushing Comey to drop the Flynn investigation.
“Daniel C. Richman confirmed to the Washington Examiner that he was Comey’s friend at Columbia. He has been referred to in the New York Times as a “longtime confidant and friend of Mr. Comey’s, “and his bio at Columbia’s website lists him as an” adviser to FBI Director James B. Comey. “
— Josh Caplan (@joshdcaplan) 8 June 2017
This entire investigation on which the Democrats have put so much expectation would genuinely harm President Trump may end up having the inverse impact as the fact of the matter is uncovered.
What the Democrats have implied for mischief might just vindicate the president and closed down the insane calls for prosecution by the similarly insane Congresspersons like Maxine Waters. That is whether she makes sense of what is happening.
What do you think about this? Do not hesitate and write your thoughts in the comment section below.
Thank you for reading.